Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
???displayArticle.abstract???
Directed cell migration is essential all along an individual's life, from embryogenesis to tissue repair and cancer metastasis. Thus, due to its biomedical relevance, directed cell migration is currently under intense research. Directed cell migration has been shown to be driven by an assortment of external biasing cues, ranging from gradients of soluble (chemotaxis) to bound (haptotaxis) molecules. In addition to molecular gradients, gradients of mechanical properties (duro/mechanotaxis), electric fields (electro/galvanotaxis) as well as iterative biases in the environment topology (ratchetaxis) have been shown to be able to direct cell migration. Since cells migrating in vivo are exposed to a challenging environment composed of a convolution of biochemical, biophysical, and topological cues, it is highly unlikely that cell migration would be guided by an individual type of "taxis." This is especially true since numerous molecular players involved in the cellular response to these biasing cues are often recycled, serving as sensor or transducer of both biochemical and biophysical signals. In this review, we confront literature on Xenopus cephalic neural crest cells with that of other cell types to discuss the relevance of the current categorization of cell guidance strategies. Furthermore, we emphasize that while studying individual biasing signals is informative, the hard truth is that cells migrate by performing a sort of "mixotaxis," where they integrate and coordinate multiple inputs through shared molecular effectors to ensure robustness of directed cell motion.
FIGURE 1. Overview of neural crest migration. (A–C) Diagrams depicting the position of NC cells (shades of brown to magenta) with respect to the placodal region (light blue) at pre-migration (stage 18), early migration (stage 21), and late migration (stage 25). EMT is progressively implemented as NC migration proceeds. Brown NC cells are more epithelial while magenta star-shaped NC cells are more mesenchymal. Top and bottom rows shows lateral views and dorsal views, respectively. Orientations and structures are indicated on the figure. Ot. ves., otic vesicle.
FIGURE 2. Neural crest “mixotaxis.†(a) The classical view of cephalic NC cell directed cell migration in Xenopus laevis. NC cells become motile via EMT and exhibit a collective behavior [collective cell migration (CCM)] due to a balance between dispersion (CIL) and mutual attraction (or co-attraction, CoA). Placodes, located in the lateralectoderm, produce CXCL12, a well-known chemoattractant. NC cells express the main CXCL12 receptor, Cxcr4. NC are migrating toward latero-ventral territories due to CXCL12-dependent chemotaxis. (b) The current view of cephalic NC cell directed cell migration in Xenopus laevis in which CXCL12, by promoting cell-matrix adhesion, contributes to defining permissive areas for cell migration in the context of a biased distribution of topological features. These include chemical and physical cues and requires a minimal stiffness of the surrounding tissue for cell migration to proceed. The main difference with the classical view is that precise and biased spatial distribution of secreted molecules is dispensable. (c) A speculative view of what the actual control of cephalic NC cell directed cell migration in Xenopus laevis might look like with the inclusion of additional features such as a hypothetical graded distribution of stiffnesses (Durotaxis) and electric fields (Galvanotaxis) at tissue scale as well as iterative biases in topography at cellular and subcellular scales (Ratchetaxis). While most of these features can be experimentally disentangled under controlled ex vivo experiments, none of these cues relies on a specific set of molecular sensors and effectors but rather share downstream signal transduction machineries leading to cell adhesion and polarity. Therefore, in vivo, each input (e.g., chemical, mechanical, electrical) is likely to extensively feed into the others leading to the exciting idea that, in their native environment, NC cells may achieve directed migration by performing a sort of “mixotaxis.†See main text for details.
Agricola,
Identification of genes expressed in the migrating primitive myeloid lineage of Xenopus laevis.
2016, Pubmed,
Xenbase
Agricola,
Identification of genes expressed in the migrating primitive myeloid lineage of Xenopus laevis.
2016,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase Aoki,
Sox10 regulates the development of neural crest-derived melanocytes in Xenopus.
2003,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase Bajanca,
In vivo topology converts competition for cell-matrix adhesion into directional migration.
2019,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase Bao,
A feed-forward loop between nuclear translocation of CXCR4 and HIF-1α promotes renal cell carcinoma metastasis.
2019,
Pubmed Barriga,
Tissue stiffening coordinates morphogenesis by triggering collective cell migration in vivo.
2018,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase Barriga,
The hypoxia factor Hif-1α controls neural crest chemotaxis and epithelial to mesenchymal transition.
2013,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase Caballero,
Ratchetaxis: Long-Range Directed Cell Migration by Local Cues.
2015,
Pubmed Cao,
GSK-3β is essential for physiological electric field-directed Golgi polarization and optimal electrotaxis.
2011,
Pubmed Capuana,
Multicellular scale front-to-rear polarity in collective migration.
2020,
Pubmed Carmona-Fontaine,
Complement fragment C3a controls mutual cell attraction during collective cell migration.
2011,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase Causeret,
N-cadherin association with lipid rafts regulates its dynamic assembly at cell-cell junctions in C2C12 myoblasts.
2005,
Pubmed Christian,
Extracellular metalloproteinases in neural crest development and craniofacial morphogenesis.
2013,
Pubmed Cooper,
Perpendicular orientation and directional migration of amphibian neural crest cells in dc electrical fields.
1984,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase Culbertson,
Chondrogenic and gliogenic subpopulations of neural crest play distinct roles during the assembly of epibranchial ganglia.
2011,
Pubmed Dupin,
The contribution of the neural crest to the vertebrate body.
2006,
Pubmed Fattet,
Matrix Rigidity Controls Epithelial-Mesenchymal Plasticity and Tumor Metastasis via a Mechanoresponsive EPHA2/LYN Complex.
2020,
Pubmed Fuentes,
Coordinated Mechanosensitivity of Membrane Rafts and Focal Adhesions.
2012,
Pubmed Garmon,
MMP14 Regulates Cranial Neural Crest Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition and Migration.
2018,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase Gonzalez Malagon,
Glycogen synthase kinase 3 controls migration of the neural crest lineage in mouse and Xenopus.
2018,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase Gouignard,
Dynamic expression of MMP28 during cranial morphogenesis.
2020,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase Gouignard,
Neural crest delamination and migration: Looking forward to the next 150 years.
2018,
Pubmed Gruler,
Neural crest cell galvanotaxis: new data and a novel approach to the analysis of both galvanotaxis and chemotaxis.
1991,
Pubmed Honczarenko,
Complement C3a enhances CXCL12 (SDF-1)-mediated chemotaxis of bone marrow hematopoietic cells independently of C3a receptor.
2005,
Pubmed Honoré,
Sox10 is required for the early development of the prospective neural crest in Xenopus embryos.
2003,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase Hotary,
Endogenous electrical currents and voltage gradients in Xenopus embryos and the consequences of their disruption.
1994,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase Huang,
E-cadherin is required for cranial neural crest migration in Xenopus laevis.
2016,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase Kuriyama,
In vivo collective cell migration requires an LPAR2-dependent increase in tissue fluidity.
2014,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase Langhe,
Cadherin-11 localizes to focal adhesions and promotes cell-substrate adhesion.
2016,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase Lin,
Lipid rafts sense and direct electric field-induced migration.
2017,
Pubmed Lo,
Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate.
2000,
Pubmed McLennan,
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) regulates cranial neural crest migration in vivo.
2010,
Pubmed McQuibban,
Matrix metalloproteinase activity inactivates the CXC chemokine stromal cell-derived factor-1.
2001,
Pubmed Meiring,
Generation and regulation of microtubule network asymmetry to drive cell polarity.
2020,
Pubmed Mou,
The armadillo repeat-containing protein, ARMCX3, physically and functionally interacts with the developmental regulatory factor Sox10.
2009,
Pubmed Muqbil,
Snail nuclear transport: the gateways regulating epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition?
2014,
Pubmed Nuccitelli,
Extracellular Calcium Levels Strongly Influence Neural Crest Cell Galvanotaxis.
1989,
Pubmed Nuccitelli,
Protein kinases are required for embryonic neural crest cell galvanotaxis.
1993,
Pubmed Nuccitelli,
Embryonic cell motility can be guided by physiological electric fields.
1983,
Pubmed Patthey,
The evolutionary history of vertebrate cranial placodes--I: cell type evolution.
2014,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase Pei,
Mesenchymal-epithelial transition in development and reprogramming.
2019,
Pubmed Pelletier,
Presentation of chemokine SDF-1 alpha by fibronectin mediates directed migration of T cells.
2000,
Pubmed Ratajczak,
Modulation of the SDF-1-CXCR4 axis by the third complement component (C3)--implications for trafficking of CXCR4+ stem cells.
2006,
Pubmed Rehberg,
Sox10 is an active nucleocytoplasmic shuttle protein, and shuttling is crucial for Sox10-mediated transactivation.
2002,
Pubmed Reversat,
Cellular locomotion using environmental topography.
2020,
Pubmed Scarpa,
Cadherin Switch during EMT in Neural Crest Cells Leads to Contact Inhibition of Locomotion via Repolarization of Forces.
2015,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase Shi,
MT1-MMP regulates the turnover and endocytosis of extracellular matrix fibronectin.
2011,
Pubmed Stramer,
Mechanisms and in vivo functions of contact inhibition of locomotion.
2017,
Pubmed Stump,
Xenopus neural crest cell migration in an applied electrical field.
1983,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase Sun,
Infection-generated electric field in gut epithelium drives bidirectional migration of macrophages.
2019,
Pubmed Szabó,
In vivo confinement promotes collective migration of neural crest cells.
2016,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase Szabó,
Neural crest streaming as an emergent property of tissue interactions during morphogenesis.
2019,
Pubmed Theveneau,
Collective cell migration of the cephalic neural crest: the art of integrating information.
2011,
Pubmed Theveneau,
Neural crest delamination and migration: from epithelium-to-mesenchyme transition to collective cell migration.
2012,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase Theveneau,
Chase-and-run between adjacent cell populations promotes directional collective migration.
2013,
Pubmed Theveneau,
Collective chemotaxis requires contact-dependent cell polarity.
2010,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase Thompson,
Rapid changes in tissue mechanics regulate cell behaviour in the developing embryonic brain.
2019,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase Tomlinson,
A chemical genomic approach identifies matrix metalloproteinases as playing an essential and specific role in Xenopus melanophore migration.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase Wei,
Matrix stiffness drives epithelial-mesenchymal transition and tumour metastasis through a TWIST1-G3BP2 mechanotransduction pathway.
2015,
Pubmed Wysoczynski,
Cleavage fragments of the third complement component (C3) enhance stromal derived factor-1 (SDF-1)-mediated platelet production during reactive postbleeding thrombocytosis.
2007,
Pubmed Yang,
Guidelines and definitions for research on epithelial-mesenchymal transition.
2020,
Pubmed Yu,
Semaphorin signaling guides cranial neural crest cell migration in zebrafish.
2005,
Pubmed Zhao,
Electrical signals control wound healing through phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase-gamma and PTEN.
2006,
Pubmed Zhu,
Electric Fields at Breast Cancer and Cancer Cell Collective Galvanotaxis.
2020,
Pubmed
